MOTHER JONES BY E-MAIL

Exclusive: Cops and Former Secret Service Agents Ran Black Ops on Green Groups

NEWS: Meet the private security firm that spied on Greenpeace and other environmental outfits for corporate clients. A tale of intrigue, infiltration, and dumpster-diving.

April 11, 2008


Supporting Documents

TOOLS

EmailE-mail article
PrintPrint article




BACKTALK

E-mail the editor





Google


A private security company organized and managed by former Secret Service officers spied on Greenpeace and other environmental organizations from the late 1990s through at least 2000, pilfering documents from trash bins, attempting to plant undercover operatives within groups, casing offices, collecting phone records of activists, and penetrating confidential meetings. According to company documents provided to Mother Jones by a former investor in the firm, this security outfit collected confidential internal records—donor lists, detailed financial statements, the Social Security numbers of staff members, strategy memos—from these organizations and produced intelligence reports for public relations firms and major corporations involved in environmental controversies.

In addition to focusing on environmentalists, the firm, Beckett Brown International (later called S2i), provided a range of services to a host of clients. According to its billing records, BBI engaged in "intelligence collection" for Allied Waste; it conducted background checks and performed due diligence for the Carlyle Group, the Washington-based investment firm; it provided "protective services" for the National Rifle Association; it handled "crisis management" for the Gallo wine company and for Pirelli; it made sure that the Louis Dreyfus Group, the commodities firm, was not being bugged; it engaged in "information collection" for Wal-Mart; it conducted background checks for Patricia Duff, a Democratic Party fundraiser then involved in a divorce with billionaire Ronald Perelman; and for Mary Kay, BBI mounted "surveillance," and vetted Gayle Gaston, a top executive at the cosmetics company (and mother of actress Robin Wright Penn), retaining an expert to conduct a psychological assessment of her. Also listed as clients in BBI records: Halliburton and Monsanto.

BBI, which was headquartered in Easton, Maryland, on the eastern shore of the Chesapeake Bay, worked extensively, according to billing records, for public-relations companies, including Ketchum, Nichols-Dezenhall Communications, and Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin. At the time, these PR outfits were servicing corporate clients fighting environmental organizations opposed to their products or actions. Ketchum, for example, was working for Dow Chemical and Kraft Foods; Nichols-Dezenhall, according to BBI records, was working with Condea Vista, a chemical manufacturing firm that in 1994 leaked up to 47 million pounds of ethylene dichloride, a suspected carcinogen, into the Calcasieu River in Louisiana.

Like other firms specializing in snooping, Beckett Brown turned to garbage swiping as a key tactic. BBI officials and contractors routinely conducted what the firm referred to as "D-line" operations, in which its operatives would seek access to the trash of a target, with the hope of finding useful documents. One midnight raid targeted Greenpeace. One BBI document lists the addresses of several other environmental groups as "possible sites" for operations: the National Environmental Trust, the Center for Food Safety, Environmental Media Services, the Environmental Working Group, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, and the Center for Health, Environment and Justice, an organization run by Lois Gibbs, famous for exposing the toxic dangers of New York's Love Canal. For its rubbish-rifling operations, BBI employed a police officer in the District of Columbia and a former member of the Maryland state police.

Beckett Brown's efforts to penetrate environmental groups and other targets came to an end when the business essentially dissolved in 2001 amid infighting between the principals. But the firm's officials went on to work in other security firms that remain active today.

Beckett Brown International began when John C. Dodd III met Richard Beckett at a bar in Easton in 1994. Dodd had recently become a millionaire after his father had sold an Anheuser-Busch beer distributorship on Maryland's eastern shore. Beckett ran a local executive recruiting and consulting business. Soon after they met, according to Dodd, Beckett introduced him to Paul Rakowski, a recently retired Secret Service agent, who had put in two decades protecting presidents and foreign heads of state and had become regional manager of the agency's financial crimes division. Rakowski told Dodd he had an idea for a new security business.

Dodd subsequently received a fax of a business plan for the new company. The sender's address at the top of the fax, according to Dodd, read: "11/02/94 USSS Financial Crimes Division/Forgery"—which suggested it had come from a Secret Service office. But Dodd was reluctant to put in the start-up money for the enterprise, because he didn't know who all the partners were. To impress him, Dodd says, Rakowski and his former Secret Service colleagues began taking him and his friends on special tours of the White House. "This wasn't a White House tour conducted by tour guides," he says. "They would take us…to areas that said 'Do not pass this line.'"

At one point, Dodd says, a senior Secret Service agent named Joseph Masonis arranged for him to tour a Secret Service facility. "To encourage me to invest in this company," Dodd notes, "they all said 'why not go up to technical security headquarters [of the Secret Service] and you will get an exclusive tour.'…They showed me everything....They were worried about someone flying way up high in a plane, miles from the White House, jumping out of a plane, skydiving, popping the chute and getting on the White House grounds without anybody knowing it. They were working on the technology to pick that up." Dodd says he was blown away by what he saw. (Masonis says, "I have never taken Mr. Dodd to any facility in D.C.") And at a waterfront party, Dodd says, he was introduced to and deeply impressed by George Ferris, a former naval special operations officer and an expert in demolitions.

Eventually, Dodd says, he agreed to be the sole investor of the new firm, and he put up $170,000, the first of what would be several loans at 15 percent interest. (His investment in the firm, Dodd estimates, would grow to a total of $700,000.) The company was officially launched in August 1995, named after Beckett and Sam Brown, a lawyer who helped get it started. Rakowski, Masonis, and Ferris were officials in the firm.

Business was good. In early 1997, Beckett Brown provided security services for Bill Clinton's second inauguration, landing a contract worth nearly $300,000. Early clients also included Phillip Morris, Mary Kay, Browning-Ferris Industries, and Nichols-Dezenhall, a Washington-based firm founded in 1987 by Nick Nichols and Eric Dezenhall that specialized in crisis communications, particularly for corporations involved in biotechnology, product safety, and environmental controversies. BBI provided protection for retired General Norman Schwarzkopf, Dodd says, and there was talk it might also get a job to guard the Rolling Stones.

NEXT PAGE: "Alley is locked by iron gates. 7 dumpsters in alley—take your pick."


 

Post a Comment

Your Name: 

Your Comment: 
 
Please press "Submit" only once to avoid double-posting.
All HTML formatting is removed from comments.
Read the Mother Jones community rules here.

Comments:

COINTELPRO lives on!
Posted by:captApril 11, 2008 7:08:02 AMRespond ^
Without the WILL FOR PRIVACY... is there such a thing as DEMOCRACY?

The Thieves of Virtue: without the PUBLIC WILL for PRIVACY, criminalizing vice functionally aborts representative government.
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/03/the-thieves-of.html


Gee, I wonder if Fox is part of InfraGard?

InfraGard & O'Reilly? Olbermann interviewed O'Reilly caller who was contacted by "Fox News security"
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/02/infraguard-orei.html

"FBI Deputizes Private Contractors With Extraordinary Powers, Including 'Shoot to Kill'"
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/02/fbi-deputizes-p.html

*** Naked Truth: Civil Rights & CNN coverage of international "F.B.I. biometric database - 'Server in the Sky'" ***
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2008/02/cnn-coverage-fb.html

Watching the "Ownership Society": follow-ups on Shareholder Surveillance
http://thiscanadian.typepad.com/thi s_canadian/2007/08/undermining-the.html

~~~
Spread Love...
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"Do no harm"
Posted by:BlueBerry Pick'nApril 11, 2008 7:52:28 AMRespond ^
And people STILL wonder why Pol Pot and Stalin killed millions? Seriously? We could kill ten million people here and not even begin to get to the really bad guys.
Posted by:osisbsApril 11, 2008 11:02:31 AMRespond ^
This article was very disturbing on so many levels. However I am confused about the last paragraph. Is there some important implication re: Obama's bodyguard service? Is it sensationalism, or perhaps planted to cast doubt on the candidate? Is there something we need to know about this candidate? I don't get it. It's a drive-by. If there is something to say, then say it
Posted by:Rebecca M IncandelaApril 11, 2008 11:15:40 AMRespond ^
Is MJ implying that hiring bodyguards through a company owned by a guy who previously engaged in unlawful PR tactics means that Obama is attempting to obtain similar shady services? Or are you saying that given Beckett's past, anyone who associates with him now should be called into question (although how widely known was that before this story broke)? I'm not sure what MJ's exact point is. Hiring bodyguards in my mind is different than hiring PR thugs to protect your company's image at all costs. Maybe MJ knows something that we don't, but without elaborating on Beckett's new organization or the role of the bodyguards further, this seems like a bit of a stretch or perhaps a sensationalist attempt to draw more readers to this article. Please MJ writers, fill us in if you think there is something unlawful occuring with the bodyguards Obama hired last year; otherwise, the last paragraph leaves tons of room for assumption and speculation. You tried contacting pretty much everyone else referenced in this story; did you try contacting Obama's people? Or how about an insider who could make a statement on the role of those bodyguards? Or, if you don't have anything to support those ideas but think that simply associating with Beckett is bad business, why not just say it?

Seriously, the last paragraph is poorly developed. Please elaborate. Without more information it seems like a distraction from the larger issues brought up in this article, which I think are quite important. Can't say it surprises me but I'm glad stories like these are getting the light of day. Green is the new red!
Posted by:JPApril 11, 2008 11:59:48 AMRespond ^
This article could have been alternatively titled, "Pathetic Wash-outs Start Company, Fail." It's not really news, and not at all surprising. Love MJ, but this article just doesn't cut the mustard.
Posted by:li'lmarysunshineApril 11, 2008 12:48:08 PMRespond ^
My friend moved to New Zealand a few years ago to start up sustainable ecovillages. He was harassed and forced to leave the country by New Zealand secret service and other government agents after they found out that he was conducting a human rights campaign exposing the Canadian Genocide!

His letter to New Zealand Prime Minister is posted at the following URL
http://msrb.wordpress.com/indigens/ another-open-letter-to-new-zealand-pm/
Posted by:CindyApril 11, 2008 6:41:21 PMRespond ^
I think that, anytime you have an institution where there's a lot of money involved, 'stuff' starts to happen. I also think that people tend to go a little overboard and be pretty sentimental about things, I myself am a little 'green' around the gills, but not to excess, rather I'm interested in the mechanics of next-generation small-scale energy, not shams or scams like the infamous cold fusion, or pie-in-the-sky stuff like energy beamed down from space, but more like things an average person could do a la Popular Mechanics.
(Insulate your home! Save hundreds per year! That kind of stuff). Why go 'small scale'? Well, simply because that's kind of how it worked before the Rural Electrification Administration et. al. got us into this consumption pattern that we're in now.
Example: Computers. They don't really use THAT much energy, but they're hooked into the wall anyway. Whhhhhyyy?
Why do it that way when you could 'build it yourself' to run the thing off a battery, basically? Batteries can get charged up via solar panels, and, if you don't feel like getting a solder burn on your pants, you could run your whole home off solar panels with inverters and stuff. A little creativity, and less with the rending of the hair and clothing and fist-shaking. It's nice to care, but it's COOL to DO!
http://www.homepower.com/home/
Here's a fun page that's got some info on it, no Dick Tracy stuff required.
Sciencer! Er.
Posted by:BertApril 11, 2008 6:56:29 PMRespond ^
Please do not be appalled. We have been engaged, albeit without pay, in the same activities regarding industry groups for decades. This is a "dog bites man" story. Haven't we all been concerned with what the opposition does? If not, please wake up.
Posted by:David L. DurkinApril 11, 2008 11:36:15 PMRespond ^
Why should anyone be surprised? That is the way the FBI works. If it wasn't for informers the FBI couldn't get any convictions.
Posted by:doyal gudgelApril 12, 2008 9:09:07 AMRespond ^
http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.d ll/section?category=PluckForum &plckForumPage=ForumDiscussion&plckDiscussionId=Cat%3ac3e173 3f-97fe-495c-963c-5d678129ebca Forum%3a8fd0deea-df6b-42c2-8a77-7e1 860b9079bDiscussion%3a3a2e97c8-3a6c-44d6-b6f6-b0594b6f0631&plckCurrentPage=2

Please check out an NJ discussion on InfraGard at a www.app.com forum. Note, the original posts on this thread discussed details about the NJ InfraGard president and then all 2 pages of comments magically disappeared overnight one Saturday night, without anyone in the Gannett organization admitting to knowing how, why or where the comments went.
Posted by:concernedApril 12, 2008 10:12:20 AMRespond ^
I googled "InfraGard" and "Tim Ward," one of the Beckett Brown and the S2i players emailed info for dumpster diving: "At one point, an employee named Tim Ward, who had been a sergeant in the Maryland state police, traveled to Saudi Arabia for the company, according to Dodd."

http://www.mitechnews.com/articles.asp?id=7751

This page lists Michigan InfraGard (http://www.infragard.net/chapters/michigan/) as one of its "content partners" and is promoting this lecture on "HOW TO PROMOTE FUTURE WEALTH," with top billing to Tim Ward, who last October was cleaned up all nice liiiike and bio'ed thusly:

"Tim Ward, the senior lobbyist for Butzel Long Government Affairs, will address Michigan’s 2007 tax reforms from a political viewpoint. Ward is a 15-year veteran of government service, lobbying, and campaign management. He served in various government positions including Governor John Engler’s director of external affairs, staff positions in the Michigan House and Senate, as well as Oakland County government."

So, apparently someone who's job involved "campaign management" for the past 15 years is also being pitched as an employee of a company so vital to our national security that the company employs law enforcement to help them break into places to dumpster dive for personal informaton about people trying to watchdog a restaurant serving food that has not been deemed fit for human consumption. Inceed, "How to ... Wealth."

The evidence seems to show domestic spying coming out of DHS, itself and through private companies, is nothing more than buildup to some corporofascist power structure. It has nothing to do with public interest or security at all.

Posted by:concernedApril 12, 2008 10:18:08 AMRespond ^
I read the story.

So what?
Posted by:CletusApril 12, 2008 10:29:21 AMRespond ^
Darn right! These energy terrorists need to be watched as do all the leftist anti-American groups.

These are the people who will destroy America from within. They are far more dangerous than any one enemy of America. They empower all our enemies and try to destroy our economy thru taxation and environmental terrorist regulation.
Posted by:RAApril 12, 2008 11:08:48 AMRespond ^
Ooookay, so how is concern over GM corn not approved for human consumption a "leftist" cause intended to destroy our economy?

Could you entertain the notion, maybe for just a moment, that maybe some Americans are concerned about their health and would like someone to ensure companies aren't selling tortillas made of cardboard or laced with Roundup as "food"?

I think the tin-foil conspiracy theorists are those who think anyone who criticizes business and government is up to no good. It's maniacal, frankly.
Posted by:ConcernedApril 12, 2008 11:49:12 AMRespond ^
A witty child in the dreamland.

There's a witty
child where
a beautiful dreamland
presents the profile
of a delicate hedge,
over a feeling, in
the care of a
blackbird; and there's
also that sunset,
the timid contour
of a glittering flame.

Francesco Sinibaldi
Posted by:Francesco SinibaldiApril 12, 2008 12:02:22 PMRespond ^

Healthcare: The Lobbyiests Hostage, is the Internet Next ?
http://toxicreverend.blogspot.com/2 008/04/healthcare-lobbyiests-hostage-is.html

Copied from the above blog:>

The American Civil Liberties Union has posted

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is holding a
hearing on Internet freedom and Net neutrality in Palo Alto on April 17,
and there is room for more than 700 people. With the future of the
Internet at stake, it is absolutely critical that those of us who support
freedom of expression show up in force, so please join us!
http://action.aclunc.org/site/Messa geViewer?em_id=5321.0&dlv_id=8821

Net Neutrality myths and facts
About the April 17 FCC hearing concerning Free Speach and
other Internet issues.
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/internet/26825res20060922.htm

The lobbyists now appear to be
influencing the FCC to "curtail" the Internet. The
American Civil Liberties Union has taken the lead
in fighting that at the April 17 2008 public meeting
of the FCC in Palo Alto California.

Will the Internet be the next hostage of the lobbyists in their efforts to corrupt science ?
"They" all ready have health care, as a hostage.

If this were simple, the problem would not exist.
Please forward and re-post - TR

Healthcare: The Lobbyiests Hostage
William F. O'BrienUniversal
(2007). Internet Archive's in-browser video player requires
JavaScript to be enabled. ...
www.archive.org/details/CI122


Connecting the dots of political influence and corruption of science:

Posted by:Toxic ReverendApril 12, 2008 2:17:40 PMRespond ^
Good job. The environmental nutso cases should not be part of the gene pool.
Posted by:big joe sullivanApril 12, 2008 4:51:00 PMRespond ^
As usual there's Monsanto smack dab in the middle of an unethical operation. There's no low they won't sink to to protect and promote their controversial genetically changed crops.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Monsanto
Posted by:DisgustedApril 13, 2008 6:19:08 AMRespond ^
Could it also look something like this?

http://www.freedomfchs.com/unwarranted_surveillance.pdf
Posted by:CouldbeeApril 13, 2008 6:03:03 PMRespond ^
Maybe You, Big Joe Sullivan, shouldn't be a part of the gene pool. Lest we spread ignorance from generation to generation.

It's the "environmental nutso" that has preserved what we have today. Have you ever been in the woods, or been beneath the surface of our oceans, or experience a nice day with clean air?

The truth is; if environmentalists never existed, then our air would be chocked full of pollution (more than it is), our oceans would be visibly full of trash (widespread), more animals would be extinct, recycling would not exist (eliminating jobs), and our health would suffer tremendously. Not to mention, the industry of renewable energy (which is very profitable) would not exist. This is not to say that the environmentalists succeeded, but rather our world is made better by those who care and made worse by those who don't.

The "environmental nutsos" still have a lot of work to do. Consider our future. Our commonality is we live on this planet together. An individual's actions not only effects their world, but has tremendous impact on the rest of us as well.

Thank you MJ, and thanks to all those crazy activist people for taking action to help preserve life on our planet.
Posted by:Environmental NutsoApril 13, 2008 11:29:31 PMRespond ^
OFF-TOPIC: MJ, not going to open up a message board on the 'mexican superheroes', there? Kind of shows a little POLITICAL bias there, don't you think? Hmmm.....hmmmm.....border fence, SI, emigracion illegal, not just no, but HECK no! End the sideshow, call the INS. Do what's right here, and start following the law. All this emphasis on holding the government to account, how about a little lead-by-example, there? But no, but no...
Posted by:BertApril 14, 2008 12:40:35 PMRespond ^
This article on corporate spying goes to show how much the coronations hate organized opposition. They infiltrate environmental organizations and unions. The forces of greed foment violence, purchase politicians and judges and spread their lies through their compliant corporate media and corrupt political institutions.

As Mother Jones said, fighting King Coal in the 1920's, the people have to “Educate, Agitate and Organize.”

Don’t believe their lies. Don’t ever give up. Educate, Agitate and Organize every day of the year.
Boycott and strike when ever and where ever necessary.
An injustice to one is an injustice to all.

Jail the war criminals and Jail the war profiteers.

We the people can take back our democracy in 2008 by not voting for their corporate stooges, their apologists and their corrupt influence peddlers.

We can demand sound environmental policy, Clean Elections and Government accountability, every day. Do not be lulled to sleep with their lip service distractions and promises to take action sometime after the next election. Do it NOW. VOTE.
Posted by:living proofApril 14, 2008 12:50:25 PMRespond ^
I agree with bert...if you're going to scream for gov. accountablity, then you should be screaming for the illegals to OBEY our laws...but oh, they don't WANT to become Americans, they just want to take over our country PERIOD. Why are you helping them? That would make you an accomplice to the crimes they are committing. Therefore, your credibilty is NIL.
Posted by:NancyApril 14, 2008 12:57:53 PMRespond ^
why all the hybbub?? Left wing groups do this all the time and never arrested. why would Greenpeace complain its exactly how they work, much to do about nothing
Posted by:danApril 14, 2008 3:44:32 PMRespond ^
How can organizations that use similar tactics to penetrate companies for the great good, critize what appears to be a disgruntled investor. When opposition groups penetrate a company using false credentials or fake names do they apologize to the company if they discover the company is playing by the rules. Isn't that the same thing. This whole thing sounds like the Investor is attempting to get revenge. How do we know he didn't creat these documents. According to the dates, he's had almost 9 years to pull together a pretty elaborate scheme for revenge. Too many unanswered questions and the information and documentation that is presented is not verified by anyone, but the disgruntled Dodd.
Posted by:BlackBirdApril 14, 2008 7:29:09 PMRespond ^
This is not a revelation. Companies such as Beckett Brown, Betchel, ITT aand DynCorp International have been doing thios type of dirty work for a while. Under the Patriot Act if any really bothers to read the fine print, the gov't has the right to hire "outside agents". Most of the groups listed are now classified on watch lists as potential eco-terrorists who may interfere with the U.S. governments various "programs".
Posted by:So What else is new?April 15, 2008 6:18:29 AMRespond ^
This is a terrific, disturbing, and sometimes hilarious (a bar owner in eastern MD?) story. Thanks to Jim Ridgeway and Mother Jones for putting it out. Every activist organization -- and many reporters -- have these seemingly paranoid moments when they wonder if someone is messing with them. And sometimes they are. BBI sounds like a domestic version of Blackwater USA, deserving of much more scrutiny.
Posted by:Tom RobbinsApril 15, 2008 10:15:57 AMRespond ^
I think I missed something. So they gathered information and fished through the garbage. What did they DO with it? Isn't that what matters?
Posted by:MWApril 15, 2008 11:33:46 AMRespond ^
Note the timeline: late 1990s through at least 2000. What do you expect from Bill Clinton's administration? Character assassination, black opps, and harassment for anyone who disagrees.
Posted by:LibertarianApril 16, 2008 5:12:07 AMRespond ^
Why is it that has no one has asked the very basic question; Why would they go after environmentalists ? Why would they go after the true patriots if they were not working for foreign entities?

Once you realize our cia came from our country's enemy-nazi germany- almost all the damage they have contributed to makes sense.
Our country is being ruin by those within who are working for europe. bushie being the last straw, unfortunately. When will we recognise traitors ? nixon and reagan should be dug up and hung !
Posted by:Douglas FirApril 17, 2008 10:52:57 AMRespond ^
you do not understand the shadow governement ran those opps- not the offical reps. it is a shadow that ran the JFK murder,MLK Rfk, waco, OK city etc.... do you realize where our cia came from ?? ( spitfirelist.com may help )
Posted by:Douglas firApril 17, 2008 10:56:10 AMRespond ^

COINTELPRO (an acronym for Co unter Intel ligence Pro gram) was a series of covert and illegal projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception........The FBI motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.......in part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's power to proceed overtly against dissident groups...... exceeded statutory limits on FBI activity and violated Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association.
In the Final Report of the Select Committee COINTELPRO was castigated in no uncertain terms:
The Church Committee documented a history of the FBI being used for purposes of political repression...."Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that...the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association,
According to the Church Commmittee:
While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security" or prevent violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent and most had no connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations and individuals were targeted because the Bureau believed they represented a "potential" for violence
The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to define the subjects of the programs. .......
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home ..The FBI and police used myriad other "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble... Harassment Through the Legal System: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate...
4. Extralegal Force and Violence: The FBI and police threatened, instigated, and themselves conducted break-ins, vandalism, assaults, beatings, and murders...including political assassinations—
were so extensive, vicious, and calculated that they can accurately be termed a form of official "terrorism."
The Final report of the Church Committee concluded:
"Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much information has been collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts.,,,,

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted by:wingtipApril 19, 2008 4:03:41 PMRespond ^
Thank you for sharing this. Nobody is safe nowadays. There is no such thing as privacy. The issue is always control.

We should all remind these government agencies that they are supposed to give us a public service.
Posted by:NicoleApril 30, 2008 2:54:42 AMRespond ^
This is stupid...what does it matter if someone was dumpster diving on you...? The homeless do it everyday, and everyone of YOU libral groups have been trying the same thing for years.
Now, if you had some secret government org. killing leaders of green peace, then you might have something, but WHO CARES if they look in your garbage...? You people are more and more revealed as nut-jobs...!!!

Bill
Posted by:Bill NighMay 1, 2008 8:03:38 PMRespond ^
Nice reporting but... why is this surprising?
Posted by:SibberMay 5, 2008 3:35:30 PMRespond ^
As one of the "environmental group tagets" leaders I knew all along that we were being spyed on, followed, phone tapped. I personally caught several different "operatives" trying to get information, breaking into offices, infiltrating conferences. These guys WERE HORRIBLE at espionage. They failed miserably and never stopped one of our actions from happening nor did they slow down our effectiveness as a group. Honestly, they sucked and need to go back to school to learn to be more sneaky. We knew who their operative inside the group was, he and his wife were working on the attempts to spy and we fed them uninformative and untrue information and let them have roles in the group that had nothing to do with the real work we were doing. What fools!!!Ha Ha. David can move MUCH FASTER than Goliath and that is always going to be the problem that corperations will have to bear. The Chemical Companies will go to any means to pollute and take advantage of the poor and unaware. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
Posted by:bearealcitizen@gmail.comMay 7, 2008 2:36:10 PMRespond ^
They were spying on us because we were so effective at what we were doing. We were getting National and International media attention about the affects of the chemical DIOXIN were having on a community DIRECTLY affected by the toxin. We were able to get the chemical put onto a list of worst carinogens known to man, we stopped a vinyl plant from moving to Louisiana and setting up shop next to an elementary school. We got the EPA, ATSDR, and other governmental agencies to start paying attention to an area that was lost on the radar. We were extremely effective on getting enviro friendly representatives elected... the list goes on. There were movies made about the work, front page exposes', PBS stories run. Industries hate this type of PR. We will continue to do our work. We will fight for the people, the voiceless of our communities. They can spy all they want to, they do not scare me!
Posted by:bearealcitizen@gmail.comMay 7, 2008 2:50:52 PMRespond ^
The information was not made up by Dodd, it was just not good espionage, they only got a tiny part of the information and most of it was just down right OFF.
Posted by:bearealcitizen@gmail.comMay 7, 2008 2:54:39 PMRespond ^
Don't worry about the "establishment" spying on "environmental" groups.Most of these groups are in the "establishment's" hip pocket already.Big Brother destroyed an important environmental law,see court case "Weber V Pena,1993" case #93-0712 US District Court for DC,in April 1993, and none of the "environmental" groups would lift a finger to stop it.
Posted by:GentillyJune 6, 2008 10:09:30 AMRespond ^
Why is this news? does ths actually suprise anyone?
Posted by:Nahko TuggJune 25, 2008 2:46:12 AMRespond ^
The Conservative right would love to see modern North America in the same condition as Victorian England. Rampant pollution due to no regulations and a complete stratification of the classes. The haves getting richer at the expese of the have-nots. Just the way-I-see-it-pal. Dave
Posted by:DaveJune 25, 2008 3:10:47 AMRespond ^

Jail.org - Inmate Search
Criminal records, instant public records & people search & current court records. www.jail.org

U.S. Public Records Search
Search County & State Court Records, Criminal records, Vital and Adoption Records www.PublicRecordsInfo.com

Records.com - People Search
Public Records and Background Checks. Instantly Search Criminal Records, Addresses and Court Records www.Records.com

Court Records & County Records
Find Instant Public Records, Criminal Records as Well as County Property Records Search. www.PublicRecordsIndex.com
















bookIN PRINT

CLICK HERE
for more great reading

headphones IN TUNE
New music every issue

CLICK TO LISTEN


This article has been made possible by the Foundation for National Progress, the Investigative Fund of Mother Jones, and gifts from generous readers like you.

© 2008 The Foundation for National Progress

About Us   Support Us   Advertise   Ad Policy   Privacy Policy   Contact Us   Subscribe   RSS